Getting a little tired of design bloggers telling you how the
Ajax method behind nearly all of Google's new web services is going to change the online world? Me too. It's not the technical part of
how you do it that makes the difference, it's
what you do and how well you do it that makes people respond. As
Jason Kottke already noted,
Google Maps wasn't the first to give us free satellite photos, they just did a better job than
Microsoft's TerraServer and other competitors.
People have speculated about the amazing popularity of Google, the power of their seemingly limitless capital that allows them to buy other upstarts and bring new services to market fast, and the good graces of their household name which gets millions of people using their products quickly. With this incredible mindshare in the still-rising Internet market, is it safe to assume that Google does us no harm? Just the other day
Nick Bradbury was saying we don't yet have a reason not to trust Google; and if you look back over the past few months, it's amazing what we do trust them with:
our libraries,
the integrity of our hypertext links, and even now
our web caches. Crimey!
Robin Sloan and Matt Thompson have recently authored a little vision of the future—er, well, from the future, as it were, and looking back on the past—um, the present. And the future. Shoot... are you confused yet? Sorry—just a bit of silliness there. But this link is worth the couple minutes viewing time and even more thought:
Where might the automation of our news lead us?—EPIC 2014